While we’re sure that the ads’ offensiveness was unintentional, their tastelessness indicates a larger problem with the way we approach activism at Princeton.
Though the campaign has indeed ignited some controversy, we still support the intent behind it. We never intended to offend or objectify women with the use of the “Save Second Base” slogan, and our primary objective has been — and continues to be — raising as much money as possible for the Susan G. Komen Foundation.
The Orange Bubble is a tired and inaccurate metaphor. The walls and gates that separate Princeton from “the real world” aren’t nearly as tall or thick as we’d like to imagine.
The University should convert a few rooms in each upperclass dorm into common areas.
The arguments for abolishing selectivity in the Wilson School application process are stronger than the quite flimsy rationale for selectivity.
Failures to engage in actual honest debate — arguments that go beyond mere shouting matches — frequently occur on campus.
I propose that Cannon Club embrace international students and their like-minded classmates when it finally reopens.
I propose we hold onto that $60,000, celebrate Lawnparties with a big band to headline it and give something else: 60,000 volunteer hours.
Our undergraduates as well as our graduate students would gain from having our grad students’ first-time-out passion and energy focused here.
My own conviction is that giving to Princeton is essential, even as we all work to support smaller nonprofit organizations that are challenged in this economic climate.
It's not that I don’t love Lupe — it just means that the same money will have a more notable impact if allocated to service initiatives.
All alumni can become involved in selecting alumni trustees; USG’s portrayal of the Lawnparties referendum is flawed
The board feels that Aditya Panda '10 approaches the presidency with the vision, confidence and competency that gives him a slight edge over Phoebe Jin '10.