The Daily Princetonian applauds the vigilance of the staff of The Breeze, James Madison University's student newspaper, for its reasoned resistance to the police’s improperly conducted search of its newsroom.
It wasn’t until I came to college that I realized that I inhabit an unusual cultural limbo — something I had not been aware of before.
As you explore life on campus, one aspect of life here that many of you may have concerns about and which you will not be able to experience firsthand this weekend is the social scene at the eating clubs. Prospect Avenue, also known as the Street, houses nine of the 10 eating clubs currently in operation. For this weekend, though, it will be virtually shut down except for club members. We would like to use this opportunity to give you an idea of what the eating clubs are like and to address some common concerns about them.
Limiting the scope of her claim to pornography that does depict women, this position still begs many questions: How do the works of lesbian pornographers who produce erotica featuring women and intended for viewing by other women fit into this axiom?
Brendan Carroll joins Michael Medeiros for this week's PrinceCast to discuss Elena Kagan and the Supreme Court, the lack of a culture of conversation at Princeton and Newman's day.
Whereas the undergrad admission process explicitly selects candidates who would fit well into the undergrad community, graduate admission is based solely on academic criteria. It is probably impossible to try to do otherwise, but it does mean the average international grad students are less well-equipped than their undergrad counterparts to deal with the issues involved.
I would like to highlight two worthy service opportunities for juniors and underclassmen thinking about next year. In addition to directly affecting the Princeton community in a positive way, both activities can be found within a five-minute walk from Nassau Hall.
While I and other Princetonians with the opportunity to study abroad on one of the major post-graduate fellowships must first give thanks to our parents and teachers, the countless Sunday mornings drowned in Texas French toast, yellow Powerade and debate over The New York Times with friends in the Terrace Club “smoking room” prepared me well for the combative, but intellectual, atmosphere of fellowship interviews.
To some of us, Princeton financial aid is generous. It is time, however, to reevaluate the criteria for the distribution of that generosity.
If you knew that the health of half our campus and our state was at stake, wouldn’t you be alarmed?
While incentivizing more people to run for open positions is a good thing, this should not occur at a cost to students who submitted their statements before the initial deadline.
The list of climate-change-related numbers is endless. But people don’t relate to numbers. People relate to people. We connect to feelings. It’s much harder to be moved by abstract concepts of danger with consequences 50 or 100 years down the line.
The question is, how much does one year of school increase a student’s employability? For engineers, this difference could be great: Engineers only take “engineering” their sophomore year. However, this distinction doesn’t exist to nearly the same extent for A.B. students.
I was tricked by websites like College Confidential (admit it, you looked at it too) into believing that I would visit a school and suddenly feel a deep, undeniable connection to it while walking around campus. Alas, this love affair never happened. I liked all of the schools to which I was admitted just fine.
McGinley seems to press us, “Wow, wouldn’t it be great, and wouldn’t we be embracing some fundamental aspects of our humanity, if we paid far greater attention to and wrestled with the moral consequences of our actions?” But the answer to that is no. Not if it means a concern with “touchstone” moral values to the exclusion of other deeply-held and fundamental human values. Much of what is great about life is valuable in spite of the moral consequences.
With little understanding of the inner workings and processes of the Honor Committee, students often feel concerned that the committee is not truly a group of their peers or representatives but is a body intent on convicting students. In considering these concerns and looking to make the process both more transparent and more representative, the creation of a jury system within the current honor system would address many student objections.
