It would be prudent for the government to recommend to those who use the new information sheet that it is important for high school students to look at published College Board material as well as the websites of the universities themselves.
Imagine what can be contributed by someone with notions of honor, solidarity and selfless service rarely encountered in the civilian world.
We believe it is fundamentally unfair that some members of the Princeton population must either devote nine hours per week to often non-substantive campus jobs or take loans to cover the contribution that could endanger their future financial well-being.
Welcome, Tigers, to the 99 percent. And that’s not a bad thing. Or at least it needn’t be. Learning how “the other half lives” — as we used to say — can be a vital part of a continuing education process that may seem ever so far from the ivory tower. Call it the graduate school of hard knocks.
We, as engineers, scientists, etc., are specifically trained to think clearly and logically, and not just about our own subject. We are trained to solve real-world problems with clarity and process. We are creative; science requires creativity in its own way. And, often, we know how to articulate ourselves fairly well. Perhaps not all of us can write with as much style as an English major, and we may not be able to think as critically about Sir Francis Bacon. But we aren’t applying for jobs as columnists for the Fiction section of The New Yorker or for the New York Times Book Review and wondering why we didn’t get them.
It is human nature to prefer the familiar and reject what we perceive as “foreign”. Our understanding of who is an American is ever evolving. Much like how a child must balance assimilation and accommodation during development, America must evolve an understanding of what it is to be a citizen. The NYPD’s actions demonstrate a lack of understanding of American progress and disregard for contributions made by Muslim-American workers and students.
One of the things I’ve always loved most about Princeton is the way in which conversations here can flow so smoothly from a discussion of presidential hopefuls and political climate to Paris Hilton’s foray into pop music. On the whole, I think we strike the balance nicely with friends at our dinner tables or over late meal. But throw us in front of our less intimate acquaintances, parents or a general public, and we lose that ease and comfort with our decisions. Through no fault of our own, we feel that we — as students or as adults — ought not to enjoy the less impressive examples of pop culture, television or movies.
America is confronting a real challenge to its security in the form of terrorism carried out in the name of Islam. But to meet that challenge by indiscriminately monitoring Muslim students from across the nation is to contribute to the legitimization of the al-Qaeda narrative while failing to secure the safety of our country.
We all know that Princeton is not in dire need of cash. The endowment is making money, and there is no shortage of funding earmarked for causes such as international programs, student organizations, the creative and performing arts and financial aid. The University doesn’t really need a few dollars from graduating seniors. Instead, the strongest arguments in favor of Annual Giving are ideological. Like Brodie’s column, they suggest that it is morally good to donate to Princeton, and, furthermore, that spending four years here — and benefiting from its riches — entails an obligation to “give back.”
Whether it’s gradual change or punctuated evolution brought on by Cannon, the now 11 clubs need to change and evolve.
Remove the codes to women’s bathrooms and communal spaces. Doing so would immediately benefit a large portion of Princeton’s population with minimal cost to the University.
The Editorial Board applauds OIT for taking this first step toward adopting a new email service. After the pilot program ends, we encourage the University to act quickly to implement a more powerful and cost-effective email solution.
Last friday, I broke out my one decent business skirt, printed out 50 — yes, 50 — copies of my resume and headed to Dillon Gymnasium for the Career Services Internship Fair, confident that my depressing losing streak of applying to internships was about to reach its end. My two friends, both prospective computer science majors, hoped that Mark Zuckerburg would be manning the Facebook table. Turns out, he wasn’t. I, a prospective English major, hoped that someone would be looking for an intern with a passion for writing and reading. Turns out, they weren’t.
The recent editorial, “Expanding Career Services,” contained misleading information that may create misperceptions among students about the resources and services available to them through Career Services and the way in which we establish relationships with employers.
Class lectures delivered by professors should be posted online for public viewing.
