Follow us on Instagram
Try our daily mini crossword
Play our latest news quiz
Download our new app on iOS/Android!

Letter to the Editor: October 10th, 2012

column

Mr. Potter (rather aptly) describes his language in his column as “cruelly blunt.” With this I am in agreement. Now it’s true that Mr. Potter doesn’t claim that Princeton students who would support Governor Romney are stupid, but he does argue that to support Governor Romney is a stupid decision. The problem is that his rather vitriolic language highlights an important problem which exists in today’s political discourse. I will leave it to social scientists and cultural critics to opine on the reasons why this is the case, and whether it is really such a modern phenomenon, but it seems all too rare for us to engage in political conversation without demonizing those “on the other side.” If a person disagrees with us on matters of tax policy or abortion, they’ve got to be anti-American or a socialist or simply behaving stupidly.

ADVERTISEMENT

The fact of the matter is that when we talk in this way it’s rare we move the political conversation forward. There are intelligent, well-intentioned, reasonable people on both sides of most debates. At very least, then, because there are many whom we disagree with who are well-informed, we ought to afford their arguments an appropriate amount of respect. This requires at least two steps: first, engaging the best arguments against those positions which we believe to be true and, second, proposing our own arguments in a way which does not demonize those with whom we disagree. On both of these counts, I’m afraid I found Mr. Potter’s opinion column lacking.

Toni Alimi ’13

ADVERTISEMENT