Rather than try to resolve these arguments here, I want to suggest another way to tackle this issue: Look through the lens of popular culture. If people cast their cultural votes at least partly through their preferences in movies, for example, then it should be possible to take the pulse of the zeitgeist by looking for a common thread in the most successful ones. And when it comes to romantic comedies, the genre most immediately relevant to our current discussion, the results turn out to be very revealing.
See if you recognize this plot: An outwardly successful man (or woman) is very adept at attracting the attention of the opposite sex. He (or she) has lots of dates and maybe even a few long-ish relationships. But these casual flings just don’t satisfy. Enter a dynamic new character, the seeming opposite of the lead in most areas that matter. They flirt, they clash, they get each other into trouble … and it gradually becomes clear that they were meant for each other. The movie ends with both characters finding true love in each other’s arms.
It only takes a casual search through movie titles to find many examples of this formula. In “Something’s Gotta Give,” Jack Nicholson plays an improbable senior womanizer who has his pick of young, attractive ladies. None of his flings, however, compare with the joy of finding true love with Diane Keaton’s character. In “Wedding Crashers,” both Vince Vaughn’s and Owen Wilson’s characters have made an art of sleeping with all the vulnerable bridesmaids they can get their hands on. But by the end they’ve discovered true love … by getting hitched themselves. Perhaps my favorite example comes from this year’s “Sex Drive.” Clark Duke plays Lance, the teenage friend of the lead character who has no trouble luring in women with his precocious charms. By the end of the movie, however, he’s decided that it’s a “man’s life” to “kick it Amish,” work hard in the fields and stay with Mary, the special girl he met on the titular road trip.
If the success of these movies is any indication, there is a strong hunger among moviegoers to see characters find that one special person who will complete them and give them something to live for. Becoming committed to just one person is seen as a sign of maturity, of discovering life’s true meaning, whereas hooking up with lots of people is seen as shallow and pathetic. Persistence and sacrifice are rewarded. Taking the easy way out through cheating or avoiding commitment is not.
Of course, casual sexual relationships are not condemned by these movies as strongly as traditionalists would like, and they seem to represent the norm for at least a certain stage in an individual’s life (namely, college and the first stages in one’s career). In the end the message that these movies send is mixed.
Another caveat is that these movies don’t really try to give accurate pictures of real-world romance. One wonders, for example, what happens to all these glorious romantic entanglements once the reality of life together sets in. (Joke: Why do Greek comedies always end in marriage? Because that’s when the tragedy begins.)
I do think, however, that the popularity of these movies shows that some very traditional ideas about love and relationships still constitute the norm for many people, even if they expect to be able to get away with a little adventurousness before getting “hitched.” In the end, society’s ideal is neither the Anscombian model of strict premarital chastity nor the sexual liberal’s. As is often the case when it comes to the choice between competing ideologies, the real state of affairs is somewhere in the middle.
John David Walters is a religion major from Thessaloniki, Greece. He can be reached at jdwalter@princeton.edu.
Read More
Why can’t lecturers win the President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching?
Jerry ZhuLet’s acknowledge those who make “boutique teaching” possible, those who work tirelessly to make our rigorous curricula more accessible, and those who dedicate their time to advising and guiding us through all the challenges we face at this University. Lecturers should be eligible for the President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching.
Let’s acknowledge those who make “boutique teaching” possible, those who work tirelessly to make our rigorous curricula more accessible, and those who dedicate their time to advising and guiding us through all the challenges we face at this University. Lecturers should be eligible for the President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching.
Princeton’s administration of justice is Trumpian
Frances BroganThe disparity between the University’s approach to Giberson and its approach to pro-Palestinian protestors reflects a concerning trend of appeasing an increasingly emboldened right rather than resisting the threat it poses to academic freedom and the wellbeing of Princeton students.
Secular Opening Exercises? Don’t throw out the baby with the bath water
Frank StrasburgerThe secular makes no room for the spiritual. What Opening Exercises are meant to convey is the spirit of the institution so that it may be kept alive from generation to generation.
The secular makes no room for the spiritual. What Opening Exercises are meant to convey is the spirit of the institution so that it may be kept alive from generation to generation.
