Contrary to the College Board’s claim that it would decrease stress, Score Choice will only complicate the SAT process by encouraging students to take the test as many times as possible. When students look around and see their peers taking the test at every opportunity, there will be no reason for them not to do the same. And as students sit for an unreasonable number of tests, it is more likely they will receive an abnormally high score — an outlier, unrepresentative of their “scholastic aptitude.” No longer bound to report all their scores, displaying only this one test will give an inaccurate impression of the student’s performance on the SAT, calling into question the whole value of the test.
More disconcerting is the fact that Score Choice unfairly advantages wealthier students. Though the price of one SAT, at $45, is not prohibitively expensive, the bill adds up quickly if students test almost once a month. Taking three SAT Subject Tests — each priced at $20 — raises costs further. And though fee deferral is available, it must be obtained through a guidance counselor for each testing and is reserved only for students who qualify for free or reduced school lunch. In many cases, families who do not qualify will find it difficult to afford frequent testing. Given that lower-income students often lack access to expensive tutors and preparation classes, Score Choice will only further expand advantages for wealthy students in the college admission process.
This facet of Score Choice also runs contrary to the Office of Admission’s efforts to broaden its outreach to low-income students, which include the elimination of Early Decision and Dean of Admission Janet Rapelye’s nationwide tour to recruit economically disadvantaged students.
If Princeton is truly committed to minimizing stress in the admission process and increasing its accessibility to lower-income students, the Office of Admission should not accept applicant use of Score Choice. But even joining schools that have explicitly rejected the system — such as Yale, Penn and Stanford — will be moot, as, under the currently announced system, there will be no way to compel students to submit all scores. Princeton should therefore pressure the College Board to eliminate the program or to at least create an opt-out option for schools that oppose Score Choice.
The College Board has miscalculated the benefits and advantages of allowing students to take multiple tests without consequences. But when it comes to Score Choice, Princeton can still make the right choice.
Read More
Why can’t lecturers win the President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching?
Jerry ZhuLet’s acknowledge those who make “boutique teaching” possible, those who work tirelessly to make our rigorous curricula more accessible, and those who dedicate their time to advising and guiding us through all the challenges we face at this University. Lecturers should be eligible for the President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching.
Let’s acknowledge those who make “boutique teaching” possible, those who work tirelessly to make our rigorous curricula more accessible, and those who dedicate their time to advising and guiding us through all the challenges we face at this University. Lecturers should be eligible for the President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching.
Princeton’s administration of justice is Trumpian
Frances BroganThe disparity between the University’s approach to Giberson and its approach to pro-Palestinian protestors reflects a concerning trend of appeasing an increasingly emboldened right rather than resisting the threat it poses to academic freedom and the wellbeing of Princeton students.
Secular Opening Exercises? Don’t throw out the baby with the bath water
Frank StrasburgerThe secular makes no room for the spiritual. What Opening Exercises are meant to convey is the spirit of the institution so that it may be kept alive from generation to generation.
The secular makes no room for the spiritual. What Opening Exercises are meant to convey is the spirit of the institution so that it may be kept alive from generation to generation.
