The Princeton community and the administration must consider whether arming Public Safety would be the most efficient way to maintain campus safety. Much of the campus discourse does not address this central question. For example, the perception among some students that Public Safety officers are ill trained and, if armed, would actually more endanger than improve student safety is decidedly a misperception that distracts us from the real issues at hand.
A careful study of the relationship between the Borough and Township police and Public Safety should be the basis for evaluating the utility of arming Public Safety officers even as armed Borough police already patrol the area around the Princeton campus. The study must also consider the potential negative consequences to the relationship between Public Safety and members of the campus community as a result of arming.
Arming Public Safety officers would be justified if it would decrease the response time to incidents requiring an armed response. If a lowered response time is deemed vital to campus safety, the University should also ensure that it cannot be more efficiently accomplished by requesting additional support from Borough and Township police. An additional justification for arming officers would be if their presence would significantly increase the effectiveness of such a response by Borough or Township police. Public Safety should also be armed if part of campus is ever classified as too dangerous for unarmed police officers to patrol.
It is imperative that Public Safety, the Borough and Township police, and the University work together to evaluate the current system for protecting campus safety in light of the serious concerns expressed by Public Safety officers. If the decision to arm Public Safety officers is made, it will be important for Public Safety to correct the misperception that Public Safety officers cannot handle such a responsibility and work to improve the relationship between the Public Safety and the Princeton community.
Read More
Why can’t lecturers win the President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching?
Jerry ZhuLet’s acknowledge those who make “boutique teaching” possible, those who work tirelessly to make our rigorous curricula more accessible, and those who dedicate their time to advising and guiding us through all the challenges we face at this University. Lecturers should be eligible for the President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching.
Let’s acknowledge those who make “boutique teaching” possible, those who work tirelessly to make our rigorous curricula more accessible, and those who dedicate their time to advising and guiding us through all the challenges we face at this University. Lecturers should be eligible for the President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching.
Princeton’s administration of justice is Trumpian
Frances BroganThe disparity between the University’s approach to Giberson and its approach to pro-Palestinian protestors reflects a concerning trend of appeasing an increasingly emboldened right rather than resisting the threat it poses to academic freedom and the wellbeing of Princeton students.
Secular Opening Exercises? Don’t throw out the baby with the bath water
Frank StrasburgerThe secular makes no room for the spiritual. What Opening Exercises are meant to convey is the spirit of the institution so that it may be kept alive from generation to generation.
The secular makes no room for the spiritual. What Opening Exercises are meant to convey is the spirit of the institution so that it may be kept alive from generation to generation.
