The lack of prior notification about the voting procedure and the confusion within the USG seem to suggest a lack of internal communication, which calls into question how effective our government can be. Furthermore, because this incident comes just days after a similarly embarrassing incident in which a portion of the USG constitution could not be found, it is imperative that the USG restore student confidence by ensuring that basic government functions are efficiently and transparently executed.
The current voting procedure, which allows voters to rank up to two candidates for U-Council, is flawed because it has the potential to yield fewer U-Councilors than there are U-Council seats. The USG uses a single transferable voting (STV) mechanism. Under the system, the threshold of votes necessary for a candidate to be elected is derived using a formula that takes into account the total number of voters and the total number of seats available. When candidates reach the threshold, their excess votes are distributed to voters' second choices proportionally. If not enough candidates reach the threshold, the candidate with the lowest number of first-choice votes is eliminated and his/her votes are redistributed to voters' second choices. This process is repeated until candidates reach the threshold or are eliminated. Any STV system that does not allow for at least as many candidates to be ranked as there are seats can yield insufficient numbers of elected officials because it is possible that too few candidates will attain the requisite number of votes necessary to be elected.
It is encouraging to see that the USG is considering steps to amend its voting process. The USG can make its STV system sounder by allowing students to rank as many candidates as they would like. The USG should not, however, require that students rank all candidates because students may put their favorite candidates at the top of their list, but then skew the rest of the vote by simply ordering the remaining candidates in the order they appear on the ballot. If the order in which candidates appear on the ballot is randomized for each voter, this skew may be minimized.
The USG must quickly address the many missteps it has recently made and restore public confidence in its competence. Hopefully then the well meaning members of the USG will be able to return their attention to positively impacting the lives of Princeton students.
Read More
Why can’t lecturers win the President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching?
Jerry ZhuLet’s acknowledge those who make “boutique teaching” possible, those who work tirelessly to make our rigorous curricula more accessible, and those who dedicate their time to advising and guiding us through all the challenges we face at this University. Lecturers should be eligible for the President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching.
Let’s acknowledge those who make “boutique teaching” possible, those who work tirelessly to make our rigorous curricula more accessible, and those who dedicate their time to advising and guiding us through all the challenges we face at this University. Lecturers should be eligible for the President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching.
Princeton’s administration of justice is Trumpian
Frances BroganThe disparity between the University’s approach to Giberson and its approach to pro-Palestinian protestors reflects a concerning trend of appeasing an increasingly emboldened right rather than resisting the threat it poses to academic freedom and the wellbeing of Princeton students.
Secular Opening Exercises? Don’t throw out the baby with the bath water
Frank StrasburgerThe secular makes no room for the spiritual. What Opening Exercises are meant to convey is the spirit of the institution so that it may be kept alive from generation to generation.
The secular makes no room for the spiritual. What Opening Exercises are meant to convey is the spirit of the institution so that it may be kept alive from generation to generation.
