An effective USG president must balance several considerations, including responsiveness to student concerns and constructive engagement with the University administration. It is this balance, admittedly a difficult one, that frames The Daily Princetonian's endorsement in this year's election for USG president. Both candidates possess different strengths and emphasize different aspects of the balance between student interests and administration relationships. Ultimately, however, the student body should put its trust in the candidate most likely to respond to its concerns. In the judgment of the 'Prince' Editorial Board, that candidate is Josh Weinstein '09.
With respect to credibility and constructive engagement with University administrators, Sarah Langberg '09 offers the stronger credentials. Her track record of working with administrators, and gaining their respect, stands in contrast to those of several recent USG presidents. Nonetheless, Mr. Weinstein best represents the hearts and minds of Princeton undergraduates. This is particularly evidenced by his efforts in the recent controversy over changes to the role of residential college advisers and the enforcement of the alcohol policy. Weinstein takes the opinions of a broad range of students into account and has demonstrated initiative by promising to take the matter up with individual residential college Masters as well as top University administrators.
The case for Weinstein, however, does not rely on his opposition to the new alcohol policy. He tallied a considerable record of achievement during his tenure as USG senator and vice president. His initiatives, including Princeton Plus and the revised late meal schedule, have made minor but meaningful impacts on daily student life. Weinstein's near-unanimous endorsement from the current USG also speaks well of his leadership abilities. Langberg has certainly proven her ability as a competent and responsible member of our student government, but Weinstein has demonstrated a superior degree of enthusiasm in pursuing reforms and issues that are of great interest to students.
Weinstein's tenuous relationship with the administration does raise some concerns, particularly with respect to Dean of the College Nancy Malkiel. Nevertheless there is much to suggest that he will successfully represent the interests of students as USG president. In this regard, Weinstein's promise to go door-to-door in the middle of his term if elected is a promising pledge, and one to which he should be held. In sum, Weinstein's track record in the USG has been marked by constant enthusiasm for and openness to student ideas, an air of approachability and commitment to the issues which matter most to undergraduates. The 'Prince' is confident that he will continue to be an understanding and capable student advocate as USG president.