Follow us on Instagram
Try our daily mini crossword
Play our latest news quiz
Download our new app on iOS/Android!

Letters to the Editor

Debate commission's partisan politics destructive to democracy

I want to expand on Andrew Frisbie '01's letter on the Commission on Presidential Debates in the Sept. 21 edition of the 'Prince.' It doesn't take a Princeton education to realize that the CPD is at the mercy of the people who nominate its members — the two major parties. Its refusal to include Ralph Nader '55 and Pat Buchanan is turning the debates away from their purpose (to inform citizens) and toward the needs of the Republicans and Democrats.

ADVERTISEMENT

The failure to include all candidates in the debates is only furthering the already disastrous feeling of political apathy that is pervasive in the United States. When people do not feel listened to, or when they don't hear their concerns addressed, they tune out the elections. The major parties cannot address the concerns of the citizenry because our nation is so diverse. And so people are tuning out the polls, and will continue to do so as long as different voices are not given a platform. This will ultimately lead to the death of democracy.

That sounds like an exaggeration, but democracy exists only when the majority sets the rules by voting (or elects people to do so in its place). Knowing that 55 percent of the eligible voters did not vote in '96, can we truly think of ourselves as a democratic society?

Opening the debates will not cure the political apathy of Americans, but I am sure that it will bring more people back to the political arena. It will thereby make our country more democratic, regardless of the views held by those who come back.

I encourage you to sign the petition to open the debates to all candidates at www.votenader.org, and to educate yourselves about what the issues facing small parties are. Do it in the name of democracy. Gregoire Landel '98

Let's not forget President Shapiro's negative impact on student life

In response to the Sept. 25 'Prince' staff editorial, I would caution students to remember the other aspects of President Shapiro's legacy at Princeton. While he has accomplished a number of the University's fiscal and physical goals, he has also overseen a few significant developments in undergraduate student life.

Gone are the Nude Olympics and if not for a great public uproar, Chancellor Green Cafe would also no longer exist.

ADVERTISEMENT

Like many college administrators, President Shapiro has made decisions without consulting student opinion and often against it. This, too, is his legacy. John Weicher '00

Subscribe
Get the best of ‘the Prince’ delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe now »