On defense of 'vanity' publishing
I was mildly amused by Mr. Kailing's crabby missive of March 11, wherein he suggested that I used a "vanity press" to purchase bragging rights. First, financial wherewithal was hardly the only criterion for publication of my work: Vantage Press has a reputation at stake and a fine one at that. If you bothered to read a copy, Mr. Kailing, you might find a hint of intellectual wherewithal (as my editors and readers did), with acknowledged influences borne out in discussion of political, social, scientific, and literary issues.
As a first-time author, I did not arrogantly assume that Random House or Viking would embrace my work as a potential bestseller. With the market for sensationalism swamping out that for more serious fare, I submitted my manuscript to Vantage after consulting several seasoned and beginning authors, many of whom used subsidy publishing as a stepping stone to publication with more notable presses. I again assert that the writing, editing, production, and publication process was a learning experience; I learned how to collect my thoughts and deal with bureaucracy, copyright issues, and multiple deadlines. More generally, I find writing to be a refreshing retreat from laboratory work.
Finally, Mr. Kailing, if ever you need a kitchen sink, I point out that the Home Depot will better serve your need than Desiderata II. John F. Staropoli '98
Read More
Why postdocs are demanding open bargaining
Guest Contributors"Princeton’s resistance to the presence of observers is a break from many academic union negotiations. At Harvard, Weill Cornell, Mt Sinai, Columbia University, and the University of Washington, there are no limits on observers."
"Princeton’s resistance to the presence of observers is a break from many academic union negotiations. At Harvard, Weill Cornell, Mt Sinai, Columbia University, and the University of Washington, there are no limits on observers."
Mineral extraction is destroying the Congo. Princeton must source sustainably.
Luqmaan Bamba“As an important and influential institution in the global green energy transition, Princeton’s role is to commit, and commit actively, to that vision of ethical sourcing for its climate infrastructure.”
“As an important and influential institution in the global green energy transition, Princeton’s role is to commit, and commit actively, to that vision of ethical sourcing for its climate infrastructure.”
Vote ‘No’ on Referendum No. 5. Here’s why.
Judah Guggenheim“Referendum No. 5 calls on the University to divest from American defense companies including Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, RTX (formerly Raytheon), and General Dynamics. The referendum ignores the necessary role that these companies play in defending democracy in American allies across the world.’’
“Referendum No. 5 calls on the University to divest from American defense companies including Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, RTX (formerly Raytheon), and General Dynamics. The referendum ignores the necessary role that these companies play in defending democracy in American allies across the world.’’
